Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


Trapped between past and account for, Kashmir’s politics is headed against a harmful deadlock


The frosty-blooded threat became delivered in silence, no longer one be conscious mentioned in public, under the searing sun of the summer in 1951. From their scandalous in Meerut, historian Srinath Raghavan has recorded, the 1 Armoured Division pushed west into Punjab; the 4 Infantry Division and 2 Self reliant Armoured Brigade perched themselves alongside the border, signalling India’s intentions to its western neighbour. The battle to attain, Top Minister Jawaharlal Nehru brooded, would be “neither transient nor gentlemanly”. He predicted, as an more than a few, “a bitter battle paunchy of suppressed hatreds”.

Later this week, Jammu and Kashmir might perchance lend a hand elections to its District Fashion Councils—fragment of the most audacious process of democratic construction in Kashmir since Sleek Delhi moved to constitutionally fold the jam into India, sparking off the crisis of 1951.

The election results, anticipated at the tip of December, will test many things: the influence of the so-called Gupkar Alliance of the narrate’s ethnic-Kashmiri occasions; the degree of communal polarisation between its Hindu and Muslim majority areas; the pressure of the authorities’s claims that its administrative cause and developmental initiatives have received its insurance policies legitimacy.

And there might be one discovering out, perchance extra well-known than the whole leisure: the flexibility of Pakistan to mutter a veto over political life in Kashmir, by the utilization of its jihadist proxies, and the lengthy-interval of time credibility of its claim to be performing as a guardian of the narrate’s Muslims against a predatory, Hindu-nationalist India.


Like in 1950, Kashmir’s constitutional reconstruction has polarised its politics on communal lines. That year, as discussions on a narrate Structure to be half of Kashmir with India deadlocked, its preeminent chief, Sheikh Muhammad Abdullah, recast himself as a communal chief: “it is some distance the Muslims who must hang accession with India”, he argued, “and no longer the non-Muslims, as the latter acquire no longer have any enviornment in Pakistan, and their handiest desire is India”. “It became the Muslims”, Abdullah went on, “who had been forced to surprise whether or no longer they might perchance rely on the Indian guarantees”.

In essence, the scholar Navnita Chadha Behera has perceptively eminent, Abdullah had remodeled himself from performing as a spokesperson for the peoples of his narrate to Kashmiri Muslims by myself.

The Gupkar Alliance, spearheaded by the Nationwide Convention and Peoples Democratic Occasion primarily primarily based on Sleek Delhi’s choice to discontinue Kashmir’s special space, has accomplished a lot the same. The Alliance’s leadership is fully Kashmiri Muslim; there are no indispensable faces from the Hindu-majority areas of Jammu or the now-Union Territory of Ladakh, nor any effort to study its representatives, bar a single, perfunctory meeting. There became no effort, either, to transfer attempting neatly-liked ground on a methodology forward.

Within the short interval of time, this makes tactical sense: en-bloc enhance in Kashmir, and in Jammu’s Muslim-majority causes, would give a put off to the Alliance’s negotiating enviornment with Sleek Delhi. There are, on the opposite hand, indispensable downsides: speaking handiest for Kashmir’s Muslims would originate it extra sturdy for the Alliance to fetch enhance amongst India’s political machine, risking political ghettoisation.

Despite the incontrovertible reality that the Alliance does retract the District Fashion Council elections—and eventual elections to the Legislative Meeting—this might perchance, then, lead to cul-de-sac. Because the Nationwide Convention painfully account for in 2003, the failure to follow it its extravagant claims to federal autonomy value it electoral legitimacy—a lesson the Peoples Democratic Occasion, in flip, realized the hard methodology when its Islamist-leaning vision of self-rule ended up empowering the Islamists whose protests introduced down its authorities.

In 1950, Abdullah believed the tension of Pakistan—and his lobbying of the Tall Powers—would enable him to leverage his legitimacy as the chief of Kashmir’s Muslims to accumulate shut to-independence. He failed. However that failure got here with bills for India Sleek Delhi would additionally develop properly to stare.


Taking a stare out at India within the wake of Partition, Abdullah saw darkness. “There isn’t a single Muslim in Kapurthala, Alwar or Bharatpur,” Sheikh Mohammed Abdullah mentioned of the toxic legacy of Partition violence, noting that “these kinds of had been Muslim-majority states”. Kashmiris, he added, feared “the same destiny lies ahead for them, too”. Hindus living south of the Pir Panjal mountains checked out these occasions by a lots of lens but saw the same apocalypse ahead: In Kashmir, they feared, a contemporary Pakistan became forming.

In 1953, the Praja Parishad, an alliance of landlords and commerce elites angered by the redistribution of their sources, launched an agitation against Abdullah’s insurance policies. Abdullah outdated-fashioned the rise of the Jana Sangh-linked Praja Parishad to stoke communal fears in Kashmir. In one speech, he claimed that the Praja Parishad became fragment of a mission to convert India “precise into a non secular narrate wherein the interests of Muslims might be jeopardised”. If the folk of Jammu wished a separate Dogra desh, Abdullah mentioned, “I’d inform with paunchy authority on behalf of the Kashmiris that they’d under no circumstances mind this separation”.

The crisis became to manual, inexorably, to a breakdown of the connection between Abdullah and Nehru. Even supposing the Sheikh spent years in penal complex, even supposing, Sleek Delhi became unable to manual to precise integration. Within the political vacuum, communal anxieties flourished, degrading Kashmir’s polity.

From 1977, when the Jama’at-e-Islami allied with the Janata Occasion—a precursor to the PDP-Bharatiya Janata Occasion alliance—Abdullah’s language grew to change into an increasing selection of irate. He attacked the Jamaat’s alliance with the Janata Occasion, “whose hands had been silent red with the blood of Muslims”. Nationwide Convention leaders administered oaths to their cadre on the Quran and a little bit of rock salt, an emblem of Pakistan.

The paranoia paid off. The Nationwide Convention received all 42 seats in Kashmir. However when the 1983 elections got here round, other politicians showed communalism might perchance be a multiplayer sport. Top Minister Indira Gandhi performed an incendiary marketing campaign in Jammu, constructed around the claim that the discrimination the jam faced became because of it became fragment of “Hindu India”.

Across the Pir Panjal, Farooq Abdullah and his newfound ally Maulvi Mohammad Farooq—Hurriyat chief Mirwaiz Umar Farooq’s father—let it be known that they had been defending Kashmir’s Muslim identification. At a March 1987 rally in Srinagar, Muslim United Front candidates, clad within the white robes of the pious, declared that Islam might perchance no longer dwell on under the authority of a secular narrate.

From the rise of the lengthy jihad on, the division became solid ever stronger. In a 1998 book, Kashmir’s Islamic patriarch, Syed Ali Shah Geelani, commended that Kashmir’s secession from India became an well-known for the survival of Islam within the jam. For Muslims to are living amongst Hindus, he argued, became as advanced as “for a fish to discontinue alive in a barren jam”. In 2006, following a successful Islamist marketing campaign against intercourse work in Srinagar, Geelani launched the fateful mobilisation that might perchance explode in 2010. He claimed that “a whole bunch of thousands of non-narrate issues had been pushed into Kashmir under a lengthy-interval of time plan to crush the Kashmiris”.

Within the next years, contemporary campaigns had been mounted, each pitting an genuine Kashmiri Islamic identification against India’s modernity-suffused vice: the targets starting from migrant workers speculated to have raped an adolescent to a trainer whose college students had been filmed dancing for the interval of vacation. “I warning my nation”, Geelani warned, “that if we don’t wake up in time, India and its stooges will be triumphant and we might perchance be displaced”.

The give draw of the political machine had inevitably begun —leading to the contemporary cycle which started with the tip of Kashmir’s special space.


In a secret account for to his senior colleagues, written in August, 1952, Nehru contemplated the teachings of the old year’s defense pressure crisis. “We are apt to Pakistan in defense pressure and industrial energy” Nehru wrote. “However that superiority is no longer so immense as to manufacture results fleet either in battle or by disaster of battle”. “Energy”, he went on, “within the kill does no longer attain from the defence forces, but the industrial and financial background late them. As we grow in energy, and we’re at threat of develop so, Pakistan will in reality feel much less and never more inclined to threaten or harass us”.

Ancient past has no longer borne out those assumptions. Despite its defeats within the wars of 1965, 1971 and 1999, Pakistan has no longer ended its enhance for the Kashmir jihad. Though the dangers of the post-9/11 world—financial sanctions, diminished world enhance, retaliation by India—have tempered the actions of Pakistan’s defense pressure-led institution, they haven’t any longer proved ample to alter its strategic intentions. Ever since 2019, Pakistan has held its hand: the quantity of international terrorists killed this year stays decrease than final year, and jihadist groups endure from power shortages of weapons. This is no longer going, on the opposite hand, to be a permanent narrate.

Firm motion on human rights violations by the Army, better compensation for land acquisition, the grant of contemporary forest rights, criminal prosecutions against a notoriously venal élite: all these have received Sleek Delhi surprising friendship in Kashmir.

These are inclined to drive life like ranges of voter turnout. They received’t, on the opposite hand, resolve the underlying ethic-non secular crisis that has bedevilled its politics.

Expectations that demographic commerce will remodel Kashmir politics, even leaving apart the ethics of this kind of command, border on delusion. Kashmir’s inhabitants involves precise 1.3 percent migrants from other states, comparable with Bihar. It hasn’t been property rights criminal pointers that saved away migrants, but an absence of jobs; it’s deeply impossible that will commerce any time rapidly.

Kashmir’s Gupkar Alliance needs to design shut that the narrate’s special space received’t attain again. Leaving apart the truth that that this special space, in prepare, supposed miniature—most central criminal pointers had been applicable there lengthy sooner than final year—there’s miniature hope that any future authorities might perchance lend a hand in mind Kashmiri claims founded on ethnic-non secular particularism. There’s miniature life like likelihood, either, that any Indian chief will face ample world tension to commerce course on Kashmir: even Nehru, chief of a a lot weaker India, became unbowed by tension from western diplomats, regarded as one of whom described him as a “prize bastard”.

Sleek Delhi, even supposing, must additionally understand a respectful, start-minded conversation on the narrate’s constitutional future—one that addresses the narrate’s many ethnic-non secular constituencies, and their considerations about their security in India. Invective aimed at the Gupkar Alliance might perchance retract votes in other areas in India, but will handiest again to sharpen resentments and suspicions within Kashmir. The longer the political deadlock in Kashmir persists, the extra threat there might be of instability for the interval of the narrate—and opportunities for Pakistan’s defense pressure to capitalise on them.

For the precise fragment of the century, Kashmir’s politics has been fashioned by opportunistic compromises, half-measures—and, when these failed, ruthless coercion. Because the renewal of electoral processes in Kashmir begins, it’s value giving precise, democratic dialogue a possibility.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like


Chamoli, Uttarakhand:  As rescue operation is underway at the tunnel where 39 people are trapped, Uttarakhand Director General of Police (DGP) Ashok Kumar on Tuesday said it...


India’s energy demands will increase more than those of any other country over the next two decades, underlining the country’s importance to global efforts...


Leaders from across parties bid an emotional farewell to senior Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad on his retirement from the Rajya Sabha. Mentioning Pakistan...


Tehran:  A member of the armed forces is suspected of involvement in last November’s assassination near Tehran of Iran’s top nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh,...